Posts by I believe in overlapping

82

Do You Think The Obama Administration Should Be Investigated For How They Treated The Trump Accusations?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i hope that the trump administration looks into obama , clinton and all the other players for trying to usurp the legitimacy of the trump presidency..

I believe in overlapping

minimus

I hope that the Trump Administration looks Into Obama , Clinton and all the other players for trying to usurp the legitimacy of the Trump presidency.

Some reports are saying that there is an investigation starting to formulate right now, to reveal who started the conspiracy talk that Trump was in collusion with the Russians. And no matter who it was; Clinton, Obama, or whoever, they will be held accountable for dividing the nation.

Here is a brief quote from this article. The rest of the article is at the bottom.

and now, Giuliani said, the pendulum could swing in the direction of probing the president's adversaries who applied pressure inside the Justice Department.

'Just pay attention,' Giuliani said. 'I think we are in a era of a real Justice Department, where just because you have a "D" after your name –Democrat, you know – or "Clinton" or something like that, you still can be held to account.

He also said of a long list of Democrats who have insisted the president and his 2016 campaign colluded with the Kremlin:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6847259/After-Mueller-shoots-Russia-collusion-allegation-Rudy-Giuliani-wants-know-up.html

82

Do You Think The Obama Administration Should Be Investigated For How They Treated The Trump Accusations?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i hope that the trump administration looks into obama , clinton and all the other players for trying to usurp the legitimacy of the trump presidency..

I believe in overlapping

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRoyKAk629w

And the end didn't come in 1975

84

Is New Zealand right to ban military style guns?

by ThomasCovenant in

jw
friends

in response to the recent terrorist attack in new zealand their government is proposing to ban semi automatic and military style weaponry.. do you agree with this idea?.

would they be better off allowing more of these weapons instead?.

would it be better to perhaps allow more of the muslim community for example, to be armed with semi automatic guns to protect themselves at their places of worship?.

I believe in overlapping

Are you a doctor who's had access to his psychiatric reports?

No, but I have lots of family that are in the medical field, doctors, Psychiatrist, Nurses, and Paramedics and they know a lot more than you do, and they fill me in. Everything i said is basic 101 Psychology freshman course. I started going back to school for business and science double major, and will be joining the family in the medical field in the future. By the time I'm 30-35 I'll be a doctor. In the meantime, I'm enjoying my spring break.

84

Is New Zealand right to ban military style guns?

by ThomasCovenant in

jw
friends

in response to the recent terrorist attack in new zealand their government is proposing to ban semi automatic and military style weaponry.. do you agree with this idea?.

would they be better off allowing more of these weapons instead?.

would it be better to perhaps allow more of the muslim community for example, to be armed with semi automatic guns to protect themselves at their places of worship?.

I believe in overlapping

Again, all the millions of psychopaths, mentally-ill people, Muslims and racists who live peaceful lives within the law can rightly feel angry with your comments.

So if the shooter in NZ didn't fall into any of the groups I mentioned because ALL OF THEM live peaceful lives-then according to you he must of just been a law abiding citizen with a clear head and no political and ideological ideas coercing him to do the shooting. He just felt like shooting and killing people because that's what normal people do.

84

Is New Zealand right to ban military style guns?

by ThomasCovenant in

jw
friends

in response to the recent terrorist attack in new zealand their government is proposing to ban semi automatic and military style weaponry.. do you agree with this idea?.

would they be better off allowing more of these weapons instead?.

would it be better to perhaps allow more of the muslim community for example, to be armed with semi automatic guns to protect themselves at their places of worship?.

I believe in overlapping

@LoveUniHateExams

Ok, so here are the groups of people that I mentioned.

There are about 4 billion people who are religious and among these there are a high number of fanatics who will misinterpret their belief to harm others. (Religious fanatics who misinterprets their beliefs)

One in four people in the world will be affected by mental or neurological disorders at some point in their lives. There are 7.5 billion people on the planet and that means that about 2 billion people can lose it at any time and go on a shooting spree, suicide bombing or some other mass killing spree. (People who have some type of mental disorder)

There are about 30 million Psychopaths in the world.

(a person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior.)

Then there are those that lose it because they’ve lost their job, wife, girlfriend, were bullied, or whatever life throws their way and they decide to go on a killing spree.

(Average person who loses it for some reason or another)

So you said “similar to TC's comment, you're laying the blame at the feet of the wrong people.”

You also said; “@TC - the problem with your line of thinking is that you're blaming the weapons (tools) rather than the people who chose to use them.”

So if I blamed the wrong people and TC blamed the weapons, and we are both wrong, people and weapons is not the cause --What’s left? Enlighten me, whose to blame????

84

Is New Zealand right to ban military style guns?

by ThomasCovenant in

jw
friends

in response to the recent terrorist attack in new zealand their government is proposing to ban semi automatic and military style weaponry.. do you agree with this idea?.

would they be better off allowing more of these weapons instead?.

would it be better to perhaps allow more of the muslim community for example, to be armed with semi automatic guns to protect themselves at their places of worship?.

I believe in overlapping

LoveUniHateExams
@TC - the problem with your line of thinking is that you're blaming the weapons (tools) rather than the people who chose to use them.

Who are the people that chose to use weapons and hurt others?

Here is a brief review of the reality of the world we live in. And no political enforcement is going to change that reality.

One in four people in the world will be affected by mental or neurological disorders at some point in their lives. There are 7.5 billion people on the planet and that means that about 2 billion people can lose it at any time and go on a shooting spree, suicide bombing or some other mass killing spree.

https://www.who.int/whr/2001/media_centre/press_release/en/

There are about 30 million Psychopaths in the world.

https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/psychopathy-2470590-Nov2015/

There are about 4 billion people who are religious and among these there are a high number of fanatics who will misinterpret their belief to harm others.

Then there are those that lose it because they’ve lost their job, wife, girlfriend, were bullied, or whatever life throws their way and they decide to go on a killing spree.

If by some chance one just happens to be in a church, a school, a shopping mall, and there is a person who loses it, and illegally gets a gun and targets you and your family, will you feel safer if you can legally have a gun to defend yourself and your family or will you feel better and more at peace if the government makes it illegal for you to carry a gun to defend yourself and your only alternative is to hope and pray to someone in the spirit realm, to make the evil go away.

84

Is New Zealand right to ban military style guns?

by ThomasCovenant in

jw
friends

in response to the recent terrorist attack in new zealand their government is proposing to ban semi automatic and military style weaponry.. do you agree with this idea?.

would they be better off allowing more of these weapons instead?.

would it be better to perhaps allow more of the muslim community for example, to be armed with semi automatic guns to protect themselves at their places of worship?.

I believe in overlapping

Now, suppose someone opens fire on a crowd, and one person in that crowd happens to have a gun. The attacker now gets shot, and that is the end. The original attacker had enough ammunition to kill a few hundred innocent people, but only managed one injury (or even a property damage shot) before being shot. Maybe a few incidents like that would make anyone stupid enough to shoot at a crowd think twice.

That right there!!

I live in a USA State where Open carry as well as conceal carry is legal. I went to church with some of my uncles who have never been JWs, and are all ex-military. They are law abiding citizens, who put family first and believe in making the world a better place. In the church, more than half of the men open carry their guns. The wives carry their guns in their purse.

What do you think would happened if some terrorist like the one in New Zealand walked into the church and started shooting??

Do you know what it feels like when you are sitting next to your uncle who loves you and is carrying a glock 17 and your aunt who is carrying a compact glock in her purse. Both of who are into competitive shooting. And all the neighbors who know each other very well and and get along with each other and are also carrying!

29

Not JW related, but should the electoral college be abolished?

by Billzfan23 in

jw
friends

elizabeth warren, alexandria ocasio cortez, and other democrats are openly expressing interest (and in come cases, campaign promises) that the electoral college has to go.

i disagree for a few reasons.

first, the 25 states (out of 50, so 50%) with the smallest populations only get 21% of the electoral college votes (in our current system, today).

I believe in overlapping

The Electoral college protects us from mob mentality majority rule. The founding fathers saw this could easily happen if say the populations of the nation shifted to some extreme religious majority. For example; say an influx of extreme religious advocates for killing apostates and non-believers immigrated into a country like the USA with open borders. Then it would be an easy thing for the majority to manipulate the voting and install a president that would enforce the religious extremist's views on politics and religious belief.

This is what the electoral was design to prevent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTZ0BYoXFyE

36

Need Help - How do I refute this???

by HappyBlessedFree in

so i was talking with my husband about all the things the organization is doing ie.

hiding pedophiles, lying about what 1914 was etc.

so his response was that the nation of israel had times when they weren’t doing the right thing, but it was still gods chosen organization.. another topic we were talking about was disfellowshipping.